Forcible deportation

SAMS » Ethics » Topics A–Z » Prison medicine » Forcible deportation

The deportation of persons with a legally binding deportation decision and the associated disclosure of medical data has been a topic for the Central Ethics Committee (CEC) of the SAMS for years. The desire of the authorities to carry out deportation efficiently must not undermine the medical-ethical obligations of physicians, especially with regard to professional secrecy.

Due to the legal changes that came into force in May 2022, the responsibility for the decision on fitness for transport now lies explicitly and exclusively with the physician commissioned by the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) and not with the attending (prison) physician. Only medical data that is really necessary for the execution of the expulsion may be transmitted.

 

This means that data is transmitted from doctor to doctor, not to the authorities. Medical secrecy should be respected. Ideally, consent to data disclosure is available. If it is refused, it is strongly recommended to obtain a release from medical secrecy by the superior authority, despite the new provision of the law and ordinance.

 

An article published jointly by the SAMS, the FMH and the Conference of Swiss Prison Doctors in the Schweizerische Ärztezeitung (SÄZ) provides an overview of these changes and the concrete procedure.

 

Read the article in German or in French (22.06.2022).

 

 

List of contraindications and medical report form

In order to assess whether contraindications exist, the prison physician can use the list «Medical contraindications to forced return by air» published by the SEM (download below). The document lists the most important diagnoses regarded as contraindications for air travel.


Any contraindications can be submitted using the form «Medical report in cases of return/enforcement of removal orders» (download below). The form was developed by the SAMS, the FMH and the Conference of Swiss Prison Doctors. Numerous other languages can be requested from the SEM.

 

The (prison) physician may only report contraindications with the patient’s consent. If the patient withholds consent, even though contraindications exist, the competent authorities may, on request, release the physician from his/her duty to maintain confidentiality. The procedure is described in detail in Appendix G to the guidelines on «Medical practice in respect of detained persons».

 

Two different roles for physicians

Physicians accompanying forced returns and assessing returnees’ fitness for transport assume an expert function. They have a different role when providing medical care for patients in pre-deportation detention: they determine whether there are any contraindications to a planned forced return, but are not responsible for assessing fitness for transport.

 

In 2013, the Central Ethics Committee (CEC) of the SAMS published an opinion on the medical aspects of forced returns, calling for a change to the existing «fit-to-fly» system. The demands and concerns formulated in this statement essentially remain valid despite the changes in the legal situation in 2022.

 

Medical aspects of forcible deportations (in German)

 

 

 

CONTACT

lic. theol., dipl. biol. Sibylle Ackermann
Head Department Ethics